|
Started by bella! at 13,Aug,23 11:15  other posts of bella!
Similar topics: 1.Cum isn't stored in the balls!!! 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. New CommentComments: |
These are results for do doctors really understand how antidepressants work
Search instead for do drs really understand how antidepressants work
AI Overview
No, doctors do not know the complete or exact chain of events for how antidepressants cure depression, even though they know how the drugs behave at a molecular and chemical level.
WebMD +1
What Doctors and Scientists Know
Immediate Chemical Action: Medications like SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors) quickly block the reabsorption of neurotransmitters like serotonin within hours of taking a pill, raising their levels in brain synapses.
YouTube·TED-Ed +1
Observed Effectiveness: Decades of clinical trials show that these medications genuinely help many people reduce symptoms of major depression, anxiety, and related mood disorders.
Anxiety and Depression Association of America, ADAA +1
What They Do Not Know (The Gaps)
The Time Delay: While neurotransmitter levels rise within hours, patients typically take 4 to 8 weeks to feel actual emotional and clinical relief. If low serotonin alone caused depression, people would feel better immediately.
Mayo Clinic Press +1
The "Chemical Imbalance" Myth: The old idea that depression is simply a "broken chemical deficiency" (like low insulin in diabetes) has been heavily questioned and found to lack direct proof. Artificially lowering serotonin in healthy people does not trigger depression.
YouTube·Dr. Josef +1
The Full Chain to Mood Recovery: Researchers are still mapping out how changing neurotransmitters triggers a broader cascade of changes—such as encouraging neuroplasticity (the brain's ability to regrow and rewire connections) and shifting negative emotional processing.
The New York Times +1
How Doctors Think of Them Now
Rather than viewing antidepressants as a simple "fix" for a chemical shortage, modern psychiatry increasingly sees them as a catalyst or cognitive window. They help reopen a state of enhanced brain plasticity—essentially making the brain more flexible so that therapy, lifestyle changes, and new coping habits can help rewire unhealthy thought patterns over time
only registered users can see external links
"Last month, Met Police chief Sir Mark Rowley revealed his officers are arresting two or three offenders a week who have been set free from prison under the programme.
Police leaders say the situation will only get worse as more dangerous offenders are let out under Labour's reforms. "
You can't make this shit up, these people commit crimes, get let out of jail to commit more. sadly people there have no firearms to protect themselves either!
Try to tell people it's not good for you,and they still want it, oh well, maybe they see each other stroke out they will slow down using
All clear results of behavior. It's human nature to risk health for other benefits.
Meanwhile, cannabis/marijuana edibles in responsible use carry a fraction of the systemic health risks that everyday sugar, tobacco, or alcohol consumption do. Unlike those substances, cannabis is widely used for genuine therapeutic benefits, offering vital relief from chronic pain, anxiety, and sleep disorders, without causing any lung damage.
No substance is completely risk-free, but isolating one risk, while ignoring the massive toll of other use/consumption/behavior is a logical fallacy.
Millions of people die every year from cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, directly driven by tobacco, alcohol, and poor diet; preventable deaths that shape our entire healthcare crisis. In stark contrast, fatal overdoses from cannabis alone are practically non-existent, and its statistical contribution to mortality pales into absolute insignificance, compared to the slow-killing 'vices' that your culture tolerates.
My country has had a liberal approach to cannabis for ever.
And 25,2% of adults report that they have ever used cannabis.
The US has always been more restricting and is still in many states.
51% of American adults report that they have ever used cannabis.
The US also has the worst drugs problem in the Western world.
What data do you need to convince you that your ideas are not working?
That's because banning things that people want doesn't work.
Making it illegal makes them turn to criminals, who also sell hard drugs.
In The Netherlands people just go to the coffee-shop where they can only
get products that are legal to sell and use. (legal, taxed and regulated)
No one is asking them if they want to try 'something stronger'.
If political and social discussions annoy you, perhaps the problem isn't the forum but your expectations. Not every conversation has to revolve around entertainment and mindless scrolling. Some people actually enjoy exchanging opinions, discussing real-world issues, and exercising their brains. And if that makes the forum seem geriatric, perhaps maturity is being mistaken for old age.
“ Some people actually enjoy exchanging opinions, discussing real-world issues, and exercising their brains.”
Do you ever rip on other countries or do you prefer to tear down the United States? You exchange a good deal of opinions with Ananas2xLekker and i don’t recall hearing him rip on the Netherlands. I compare the U.S.A. to family. Am I always happy with my family? No and I don’t and will not allow or tolerate others to tear them (family) down or insult them because they are my family. I am a moderator on the Nextdoor platform for “my neighborhood” and someone posted the following;
“Happy BLUE WAVE WEEK TO EVERYONE!”
And one lady posted;
“Proud to be an American”
And I responded;
“I am, too, 24/7/365! I WILL ALWAYS BE PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN EVEN WHEN MY POLITICAL AFFILIATION ISNT HOLDING AN OFFICE! “
Are you a proud American? I suspect you are, why not act like it?
Most of the time, though, I’m not well versed enough to have opinions about other countries’s politics. Yes, I know of some of the policies of other countries but I believe that we have enough to fix in this country without borrowing problems.
You say you are not always happy with your family. When you are not, do you sit back or try to fix the reason for the unhappiness?
I have never insulted my country nor have I tried to bring it down. Many people mistake dislike for the current government as being anti American.
If you’ve noticed my exchanges between Ananas and me, then you should have seen that I seldom comment on the dialogue between him and Phart. I do comment when Ananas states a truth about the USA.
And Ananas is right. The average American is under-educated. Most of us have no idea what happens in the rest of the world or in this country, for that matter and how our country is partly responsible for what is happening in their world.
Ananas has the right to his views on America. We are a HUGE influence on what happens in his country and the rest of the world.
I’m glad you are a proud American. I am too, but I am more than just proud. I want to see it be better. Many of the exchanges between Ananas and Phart, Dgraff, and others, occur on your threads, yet, you seldom get involved.
I want socialized medicine. I want better treatment for the unfortunates that are homeless, illegal, or under incarceration. I believe in helping people to have an easier time getting to vote in public elections. I want fair minimum wages. I don’t want for my president to obscenely profit for being the president. I don’t want my country to invade or go to war with other sovereign nations without my Congress saying it’s okay. There’s many more things that I would like to change. Seeing a mother go hungry so she can feed her baby in one of the richest nation in the world is a crime.
But, yeah, I guess I don’t act like I’m a good American.
I have to point out, though. This last election showed that people are tired of what the current administration is doing with their country. And, they too put down what is happening here.
So, if you won’t tolerate others to tear down your “family”, then you’re putting down a HUGE AMOUNT of your family.
And yes, it does feel to be a “personal attack” towards me.
I believe it’s because I posted a response to AngelOfDeath‘s post. Your friend.
It’s okay. Most of my controversial comments occur in my thread. And it’s where Ananas, Phart, and others like to do their POLITICAL commentaries. The same on Tecsan‘s political thread.
Same with Iran and a nuke, we know they are wanting a nuke,we know other enemys are probably selling them materials, why not take premptive action to prevent them from having a nuke? Instead of "oh, no threat right now,they don't have 1 yet" and then wait until they are waving it in our faces to finally then say,"oh we have a problem".
As far as political discussions, there is a little rolly knob on my computer mouse that allows me to scroll past what I don't like or don't want to respond to, I think there are some down right,straight up IDIOTS on this forum,but hey, live and let live. Some like Ananas will at least try to explain their mindset, others like leo,just call people names and jurk off in their coffee.
As far as skipping a chat, I agree. If you don’t like it then pass on it.
"Crossplay games be like"
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Um
only registered users can see external links
I wouldn't call her unrecognizable, but let me quote her:
"If I look older than when you saw me last, it's because I'm older
than when you saw me last."
Perhaps she's simply allowing herself to look like a 68-year-old woman.
Do you have a problem with that?
She is a lesbian who doesn't dress and wear her hair like a woman.
They call themselves "butch", but it's also called "masculine-presenting".
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
PoloFields added a comment on your abuse report: Agreed, we do need an AI policy here, either from admin or the panel to hash one out. It may have to be the latter since I don't know if admin is acting on it. This seems to be a pretty blatant ad for an AI site and seems inappropriate here.
steve3095 added a comment on your abuse report: AI pics and numerous different women in the pics. Appears to be internet pics.
badboy666 added a comment on your abuse report: its about time we learnt to keep it real, AI should not be here
Juchuh02 added a comment on your abuse report: It should be a real site and no KI
DeepThroatThis added a comment on your abuse report: Enough
Again, so odd that 3 of the 5 voters are in agreement to delete an AI profile yet are supporters/friends of the biggest site offender, the creator of the Sophie profile.
--------------------------------------- added after 15 hours
The 3 of you members who support this farce, @Sophie_+_Friends_Only_Universe need to visit my page ro see what a happens when “you” piss off a drunken psychopath! Oooooo, he’s scary!
You are, without question, one of the biggest trolls here, bella!. Small wonder, then, that so many on this site see fit to hunt and ridicule you.
And let it be noted: I have stayed out of your business, while you have done nothing but constantly poke your nose into mine. Granted, previously we were at each other — but since sending my profile underground, I have resisted your consistent taunting within your forum threads, and I have bitten my tongue.
This platform hosts a great many AI profiles, with new ones emerging constantly. Several weeks ago, I made the decision to send my own profile underground. All of my content is now invisible to everyone except those on my friends list. I have ceased public blogging entirely, choosing instead to share thoughts and stories privately — exclusively with those willing to listen, inside a private, locked group.
I made this decision for several reasons, chief among them, though not limited to, the following: admin, whom I affectionately call Boss, admitted to me via private message that my profile had become a profane pain in his ass, with numerous reports landing on his desk daily. Trolls began attacking friends of the profile, and some who might otherwise have engaged with it held back, deterred by all the 💩 surrounding it — and others. Those, however, were the primary ones.
My profile once dominated this site: the main wall, the comments, and countless other corners of it.
These days, apart from a handful of images posted publicly each week — visible for less than 24 hours before vanishing to friends-only — the occasional wall advert every couple of days, and little else, the profile is all but invisible.
Yet here you are, with your 💩, once again.
admin, I would respectfully request your assistance regarding the persistent harassment from member bella!. Would you kindly initiate an administrative blacklisting between member bella! and myself, exactly as you did previously between PITBULL and tecsan? I thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.
Administrator:
Sophie_+_Friends_Only_Universe
Feel free to razzle and dazzle anyone and everyone who joins you in your world of fantasy. What concerns me is the mindset and the ability of the voting members to be unbiased. Again, they are voting to boot AI profiles while supporting the biggest offender here, YOU!
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
She's talking about jobs at DoorDash and McDonald's, the absolute bottom.
Besides, Yea, I don't want to do business with people with blue hair.
Even if they do EVERYTHING right, the prices of homes are rising faster
than they can ever grow their income. In your youth, everyone could become
a homeowner, now it is only for kids with rich parents, or the few very lucky ones.
The company I work for doesn't look at that. There are some limits; you're not allowed to walk around in your underwear or show Nazi tattoos, but outside of that they only look at your potential. We do business with people who don't mind doing business with people of various stripes. If other companies don't share our values, then we do not care to do business with them.
But they tried. Here in the US and other places, you can produce WAY more kids than you can feed because the idea is let their rich Uncle Sam feed them. that is the root problem. to many people.
"People want high wages, it requires high prices."
WRONG; it requires that more money goes to the people who do the actual work
and less money goes to the people who don't add any value.
Let's find an example where the service of the worker are the direct product,
so you see the best link between price and wages; a basic men's haircut.
(We are talking about workers who work for a boss, not self-employed people)
Average Consumer Price (of a basic men's haircut):
US: $30 to $45 (Plus expected tips 15% to 20% -> total: $36–$54).
NL: Ђ15 to Ђ25 (Roughly $16.50 to $27.50). Tipping is rare and/or only a small token.
Worker Base Wage Floor (of a hairdresser):
US: Often tied to the federal floor $7.25/hr or state floor (e.g., $10–$15/hr).
NL: $16,52 (Ђ14.71) /hr absolute minimum, but legally scaled up based on experience (via the Kappers-CAO (Hairdressers Agreement))
Mandatory Protections (for hairdressers):
US: Zero federal paid sick leave, zero paid vacation, and employer healthcare
is rarely provided.
NL: 8% holiday allowance, 25 days paid vacation, fully paid sick leave,
and mandatory employer pension contributions.
So the price in my country is about HALF, while our wages are up to DOUBLE.
And they have lots of benefits that American hairdressers don't have.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE THEN:
Just a while back we talked about the wages of McDonald's workers.
They make considerably more in the Netherlands, than in the US.
Hourly Wage (Adult 21+):
US: $11.00 to $14.00 / hr (Stuck at $7.25 in states using the federal floor).
NL: $17.10 (Ђ15.22) / hr absolute base (Set by the mandatory Horeca CAO).
Mandatory Benefits & Rights
US: NONE!
NL: 8% holiday allowance bringing it to $18,47 (Ђ16.44) / hr,
25 days paid vacation, fully paid sick leave, built-in pension accumulation,
and strict overtime premiums.
So, that should result in McDonald's being astronomically more expensive
in the Netherlands, RIGHT?
Price of a Big Mac Meal:
US: $9.50 to $12.00 (Varies wildly by state and franchise location).
NL: Ђ9.50 to Ђ11.00 (Roughly $10.40 to $12.00).
(there are no cheap locations in my country, because we are densely populated)
If it is just price vs wages, explain this.
Who covers the cost of all that vacation leave and such? what is the tax rate on those wages?
We have a self-employed hairdresser who comes to us.
She doesn't have a boss skimming her and she doesn't need a salon.
For her, every cent that she adds to the price results in a higher income.
We were talking about employees of a company, that's different.
You are starting another argument; the taxes don't change the costs
for the business.
Your argument was that higher wager MUST result in higher prices.
I just showed you that this is NOT correct.
If the company does a hair cut for 28 bucks in your country,which is less than ours, but yet they get paid for not being at work, that money is coming from somewhere?? WHERE!?????
McDonald's STILL makes profit in my country, and not a little bit either.
So do hair salons, food delivery services, supermarkets, drugstores, internet providers, insurance companies, movie theaters, gym chains, the train, airlines, private educational courses, etc. They all exist in my country, pay better wages, offer better services, and are either more affordable or have similar prices.
We just don't transfer as much money from the average citizen to the wealthy
like you do in the US.
You are assuming corporations use "cost-plus" pricing (blindly adding a fixed profit markup on top of their expenses). They don't. They use value-based pricing, centered entirely on finding the price optimum.
• The Price Optimum Formula: A corporation continuously tests the market to find the exact intersection where Price Ч Sales Volume yields the absolute maximum total profit. They always charge the maximum price the local market can tolerate before demand collapses.
• The Demand Ceiling Capping Prices: If a company raises prices beyond this optimum just because their internal costs (like wages or rent) went up, they ruin their own demand. A higher price that causes a massive drop in customers results in lower total revenue. Therefore, prices are structurally capped by consumer purchasing power and local competition, not driven upward by a company's internal bills.
• Costs Impact Profit, Not Price: Internal expenses, whether they are wages, taxes, or real estate, dictate the profit margin, not the price tag. When operational costs rise, a company has a choice: accept a slightly lower profit margin to maintain their sales volume, or raise prices and risk destroying demand.
I would not call this 'basic economics', but it all aligns perfectly with standard neoclassical microeconomic theory. It is fully backed by academic economics because it directly operationalizes the foundational principle that firms are profit maximizers operating under demand constraints.
The Ultimate Proof (Recent US Price Cuts): Look at McDonald's recent behavior in the US. After aggressively raising prices for years, they were forced to introduce value menus and slash prices. They didn't do this out of goodwill, and they certainly didn't do it because their labor or supply costs suddenly dropped. They did it because consumers, strained by economic uncertainty, stopped buying. Demand collapsed, forcing McDonald's to lower their prices back down to find the new market optimum.
Public narrative heavily distorts economics into a moral tale of companies just covering their bills. In reality, economic theory demonstrates that corporations are just cold, optimization algorithms. They charge the absolute maximum the market will bear. They will ONLY lower prices if they can make more profit from it, by increasing demand.
so a whopping 5 bucks total. You are telling me there is enough profit for them to pay all those employees for 20+ days off, 18 dollars a hour and all that?
Please show me the math, I would appreciate it.
only registered users can see external links
Those breakfasts cost almost nothing to make. There is like a 75% markup on that. The labor on it is also almost nothing. The secret behind the profit from low-priced meal deals lies in the drinks. Coffee and soft drinks have the highest profit margins in the entire hospitality industry. Coffee has a profit margin that can reach as high as 2,900%.
Companies often uses a cheap breakfast item at an extremely low price as a loss leader. Even if they make barely any profit on that specific article, it is profitable because customers rarely order just that one item; they almost always add a drink, a hash brown, or an extra snack.
It was my girlfriend's birthday, and she received a code from the garden center to pick up a free plant. It’s a lure, really, because once you’re there, you end up having a bite to eat in their restaurant (for $25), buying a few plant pots, some potting soil, some Christmas items, a couple of bags of chips, and so on, and suddenly you’ve spent $150. That’s how they make a profit off a free plant.
All Dutch supermarkets sell bananas at a loss, because they are a traffic-builder:
- Bananas are a price-sensitive product. Customers know roughly what they should cost, so a low banana price makes a supermarket seem cheap.
- They attract customers. Once people come in for cheap bananas, they often buy other products with higher profit margins.
- Bananas are used for price competition. Supermarkets may deliberately accept a small loss to compete with rivals and strengthen their overall price image.
- The loss is compensated elsewhere. The supermarket makes money on products with much higher margins, so losing a few cents per kilo on bananas can be worthwhile.
In short: the supermarket isn't trying to make money on every banana;
it's using cheap bananas to make money on the customer's entire shopping basket.
Don't you know these things? In my country, we have several consumer affairs programmes, who investigate things like this and advice the customer. I watch all of those, and that's how I know how all these commerce tricks.
is a better option than either or all three other options?
The entire goal of working is to be able to afford to live. Right?
When I secured my job at BCBSM I could have been assigned to the mailroom but I wasn’t. I dated a fellow employee who was a garage attendant. At the time he applied for a job at BCBSM, they didn’t have anything open within his field and rather than cutting him loose, they gave him a temporary job in the garage. My guess is that the remuneration was that of an entry engineer, because he stayed in the garage for slightly more than one year before he got THE job he earned his degree in.
There are too many of those 'entry-level jobs' in your country to fill them with just high school kids.
That means that there will be by design many people stuck in jobs that do NOT pay a living wage. Then you have a choice of supporting them with food-aid programs, which means that you are supporting the profits of all those fast food companies with tax-payer dollars, OR you have a huge chuck of your community grow old without any progress in life. They will live in slums, eat garbage, never have kids or have kids grow up on the streets becoming addicts and gangsters, and then die young from poverty related illnesses. Is that Making America Great Again?
If the American people do indeed pull themselves up by their bootstraps, and make it to managers, engineers, accountants, lawyers, dentists, economists, architects, etc, by working 100 hrs/week in their fast-food jobs, to pay for their education, then who will do those jobs that pay shit wages? That will make the owners of McDonald's very sad and they will pay your politicians to open the borders and let in lots of 'dirty' immigrants to do their shit jobs.
only registered users can see external links
When the robots replace all the workers, it just means that ONLY
the wealthy owners make money from giving people obesity,
diabetes and heart disease.
Well, maybe some programmers and maintenance people will have a job.
Those are better jobs, so that's an improvement, but where will all the numbties find a job?
Look around and see how dumb the average person is, then realize
that 50% of them is dumber than that. How are they going to learn
to program AI and maintain robots (if they don't maintain themselves)?
Will the people who cannot manage in the robot economy be the pets
of Elon Musk, or put to work in government funded sheltered workshops,
do they get Universal Basic Income (UBI), or will they just starve?
Oh, well I forgot,people are to LAZY to get educated ,although 1 thru 12 is FREE to all
only registered users can see external links
Come to think of it, I haven't saw omar so mad since her brother forgot their honey moon!
I wonder how it felt to her last week having her home invaded like the dems did to Trump and Mar largo? I also wonder if the agents dug thru her panties like they did Melanias? to get dna samples, may have needed to.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 hours
Not only did she marry her brother but her 1st daughter is of inc--t. which is yet another illegal action. I guess liberals will be defending that next. it's ok to marry and get prego from your bro
only registered users can see external links
Won't be as long as we think before the replacators on the Star ship Enterprise will be yet another out of date tech like the flat screen tv and hand held flip phones. Just think,no trips to mandomi's 911 grocery store, just stand in your kitchen and say, " Hamburger" and poof!
all of MAGA is going to accept it, eat it and defend it.
MAGA loves an immigrant billionaire who makes his money from electric cars
and space shit, paid for with your tax-dollars, because he turned Twitter
into the source for their daily rage-bait.
You have choices. The choices of voters got you where you are now,
and the choices of voters can turn you back on a better track too.
Lots of politicians on the the left do not take corporate money and there are more of them now. Some libertarians also do not take corporate money, but they are a dying breed. Overturning Citizens United isn't easy, but they got it in too.
All of them are corrupt....does not matter what side....left and right are just labels .....
It's a lot easier to buy politicians than voters....
That's exactly what they want you to believe.
Then you don't hold them accountable.
No money in peace is there,America has been a war economy for centuries...do you think anything has changed ?Global banking built on a FIAT system that fucks consumers not corporations,guarantee continuing debt and interest payments from nations under the guise of monetary aid ,knowing full well those developing economies will fuck it up unable to keep up interest.
EU is a copy of the USA....it's just a banking cartel....all the freedom of movement and unity stuff,free trade etc,is a ploy to own the currency.....
France is bankrupting Africa with CFA franc which bankrolls the French treasury to buy USA treasury bonds,while China buys the mines...
And you think you can hold these people accountable....?hilarious
Everything you said about the IMF, debt traps, and the global economy has truth
to it. But treating it like an unchangeable 'death cult' means giving up before the fight even starts. Change has never come from the top down; it’s always pushed from the outside. The labor rights we have, environmental regulations, local consumer protections, none of that was handed down by benevolent bankers.
It was clawed back by cynical, tired voters who still chose to do something rather than shrug and say 'it's all a cartel.' Cynicism feels smart because it's never wrong about how bad things are, but it never built anything better either.
If they didn't think that your opinion matters, and they had it all in the bag, they wouldn't spend so much money on campaign ads for Republicans and corporate Democrats. They also wouldn't have the corporate media attack the left constantly. There's a good reason why the left is their enemy, and it's not to defend the rights of working people.
You talk about activism on a small scale...that's nationalism.....EU doesn't like nationalists....that's why they want open borders and single currency.You're not anti EU now are you ?EU is stripping away nations right to govern themselves bit by bit....who does that benefit the most,it's the corporations not individuals..
Change is supposed to come from the top,that's why you vote...but guess what,they are already compromised by the time they get to office....quid pro quo...
At the most basic human mindset....it which everyone has to ask themselves "what's in it for me?".....people pick a side based on what is in it for them,they rarely do it out of principles...
As me being a cynic ,so what,I'm not smart at all....I'm just expressing my thoughts
AOC is NOT a millionaire and Nancy Pelosi is FAR from being a socialist. Pelosi is a corporate centrist Democrat, who takes lost of campaign donations from the wealthy. She hates progressives, leftists and socialists just as much as any Republican, because they are a threat to her wealth, that is based on corruption.
Just don't think that Pelosi's corruption is worse than any Republican's.
"Change is supposed to come from the top"? Who told you that? In history, change has almost always been fought, bled and died over. The only time you could say something like that was when your founding fathers wrote The Constitution, but don't think that the working class had nothing to do with that. People were fed-up with a ruling class sending them off to die in wars, and the elites were afraid to end up at the end of a pitchfork.
I am not against the EU in principle, but I am very much against how it is organized to favor the wealthy and corporations. The Socialist Party is also
not against European cooperation, but we fight against the EU power grab constantly, and fight for countries to retain their sovereignty and self-determination.
You are right about people's selfish nature. So, what makes people give up
their "what's in it for me?" reasoning, when they want to give up all their rights
as workers, their pension, their social safety net, to further enrich some wealthy assholes who think that they deserve everything they take, and YOU deserve nothing?
You might be smarter than you think, because you ask better questions than most. Your thoughts are very anti-establishment. I can relate to that, but why do you think that AOC is the establishment? She was despised by both parties, when voters made her a representative. Remember how she was dismissed as a stupid waitress? They spat on her as a peasant. And now she has some money, she is the establishment? Who told you this nonsense?
Let's say AOC will keep her current function for the next 40 years. Elon Musk makes the same money in 7 minutes and 46 seconds. And he went on stage
with a chainsaw joking about cutting government money. Since then, he got
$38 BILLION in total government funding, loans, subsidies, and tax credits.
AOC would need to keep her function for 218,391 years to earn that.
During WW 2, victory gardens were the thing,the stack of old news papers I have show ads encouraging them. not if but WHEN we have WW 3, most of the damn liberals will starve to death because if they can't go to starbucks they go hungry and thirsty
for decades. Your country allows chemicals and processes for your food that other countries are mortified about. That's because it makes the manufactures more profit.
That is more important than your health. Don't act like this is something new.
I am sure you have bought gasoline, but diesel? that is what most farm machines run on. Have you bought fertilizer ? Have you tried to plant a crop,and save your own seeds and wind up gettting sued? So then have you bought seed every year?
I could go on but that will be enough for the example.
You over regulate the energy sector,it makes the diesel go up.you over regulate the industry making fertilizer,it goes up, you continue to allow seed companys to hold patents on "their" seed and there is a cost that goes up every year. all this and more to produce food period,regardless of healthy or slop. can't you see the problems that regulation can cause? you can only see the 1s it prevents.
Well, make you billionaires do it then. That's what you say you have them for.
• Percy Schmeiser (199
• Systemic Enforcement: Studies by groups like the Center for Food Safety note that agrochemical companies have filed hundreds of patent-infringement lawsuits against small farmers and seed cleaners.
Been a problem for years
Oh and yea, farmers get sued and such for saving rain water to.
1800 people arrested, buildings burned,welcome to 2026, the new world order
only registered users can see external links
Do you think that taxes on labor are more fair?
You own your body, you provide your time and your energy,
and then someone says "30% of what you just made is mine!".
The government needs money. Where do you want it to come from?
Do you believe in the principle of "Those with the broadest shoulders
should bear the heaviest burden"?
At least he has some property. Why do people who own NOTHING still pay taxes for the ONLY thing they have? As soon as their taxed labor allows them to own a roof over their head, a thing they need to survive, they pay property taxes. The property tax in the US
is about 1%. You pay that, even if your mortgage is higher than the value of your home.
Elon Musk own companies and property valued around 1 TRILLION dollars.
He pays roughly $930,000 annually in property taxes. His companies usually secure
100% property tax exemptions and there is no wealth tax. That means that Elon Musk pays ~0.00009% annually over his ownership. He also doesn't pay taxes over his labor, because he is paid in stock options. He only pays taxes when he sells them, which he almost never does, because he lives of personal loans, using his Tesla and SpaceX
stock holdings as collateral.
So, some people pay 1% over property that the bank owns and other people pay
almost nothing for property that they fully own and makes them money.
Now you know that, do you think differently about what that nice man was saying?
"The average effective property tax rate in the United States is approximately 0.8%
to 1.1% of a home's assessed or market value (with a national median rate hovering around 0.9% to 1.02%)"
A government ought to hold a higher moral standard than the criminals it punishes.
They fucked up. That’s the reason she survived. Just shooting her brains out would have been less cruel than what they’ve done to her. But that would LOOK brutal.
It would destroy the sanitized image that allows this practice to continue.
And that, to me, is part of the problem. Some Americans need the people who commit horrific acts to be monsters, because it is easier to condemn monsters than to confront the failures of the society that produced them. Others couldn’t accept the brutality of state killing, so they made the killing look less brutal instead.
That’s how you end up with this: not a society becoming more humane, but a society finding cleaner ways to present its brutality. The United States keeps refusing to confront the uglier parts of human nature and its own failures, and instead keeps finding ways to sanitize them. At some point, a nation that considers itself civilized
has to grow beyond that.
AND reject Israel for committing a horrible genocide.
The actions of Israel do not get rid of the threat, it motivated millions of Muslims all around the world to hate them even more. Jewish people are suffering from more antisemitism because of this. Not everyone can make a mental separation between Jewish people
and Israel's genocide. You should understand that, because you cannot make a mental separation between individual Muslims and Islamic terrorists.
only registered users can see external links
By the way, satellite internet SUCKS:
• High Latency: Traditional satellites sit over 22,000 miles in space.
This distance causes data delays, making live online gaming, video calls,
and fast browsing feel sluggish.
• Weather Disruptions: Heavy rain, snow, and dense cloud cover can easily weaken
or block the signal (a problem known as rain fade).
• Strict Data Caps: Many providers strictly limit your monthly high-speed data.
Once you hit that limit, they drastically throttle (slow down) your speeds.
• Network Congestion: You share bandwidth with everyone else in your region.
During peak evening hours, speeds often plummet.
• High Setup Costs: The upfront cost for the dish and router is typically very expensive compared to standard cable or fiber setups.
for less remote areas, with much larger communities, and forcing them to rely on Starlink, because that fills Elon Musk's pockets.
Trump got his donations, Musk gets people who stay dependent on crap satellite internet,
and lots of tax-dollars for his business, and Americans get fucked over.
By the way, you pay about twice as much as we do, for worse internet.
On a simple comparison website, I have the choice of 68 different internet subscriptions from 8 different companies. The cheapest one is $315,83 for a YEAR for 30 Mbit/s down and 3 Mbit/s up. I could have 2000 Mb/s up/down fiber for $434,46 for a YEAR or 8000 Mb/s up/down fiber for $718,81 for a YEAR. Those are all stable wired connections,
without hidden added costs for equipment. Adding phone or TV subscriptions will result
in discounts, but it is harder to compare TV services.
Currently, I have 100 Mbit/s down and 10 Mbit/s up, which is more than I need,
but my provider is working to replace all copper with glass, so I will be transferred
to something faster in a while.
Throwaway oil plugs, when they used to last the life of the car unless a dimwit got ahold of it.
only registered users can see external links
Things like these plugs are easy to recycle or burn.
AngelofDeath
Mentally retarded and physically deformed drunken bogan mouth breather that can’t get attention on his own so using AI rage bait to get off with all the idiots that thinks it’s really a chick nope just a desperate weirdo you yank to behind the ai
Maybe its time to move on luv, if not, you opinions on this profile mean nothing to me, just like your best friend bella! opinions about me.
Maybe you should get a puppy for a new hobby 🤷♂️.
WELL!! Not sure I've ever witnessed this side of you!
I do like it!
😆😂🤣
only registered users can see external links
Why make people beg to pay for healthcare?
I don't live in a paradise, but we don't have THIS for Medically Necessary Care, YET.
If my countrymen keep voting for right-wingers, we WILL have this too.
They are planning to raise the deductible AGAIN.
The total cost of education and tuition to become a heart (cardiothoracic) surgeon in the U.S. generally ranges from $300,000 to over $600,000, not including cumulative living expenses or loan interest.
Cost Breakdown by Phase
• Undergraduate Education (4 Years):
• In-state public: ~$120,000
• Private university: ~$220,000 to $250,000
• Medical School (4 Years):
• In-state public: ~$167,000
• Private school: ~$275,000 or more (plus application and MCAT fees).
• Residency and Fellowship (6–8 Years):
• Cost: $0 in tuition.
• Once you graduate from medical school, you enter a residency and fellowship. During this time, you are paid an annual resident salary or stipend (averaging around $67,000 per year), meaning specialized training does not cost additional tuition.
Training Timeline
Becoming a heart surgeon requires 13 to 15 years of total post-high school education and training
that is just 1 example,
here is another
Why do we have this?
The total cost to build a hospital in the U.S. typically ranges from $88 million to over $200 million for standard facilities, with overall costs averaging $440 to $455 per square foot.
And also it is federal law that 10% of the cost of building a hospital has to be spent on ART to display inside and around it. ART for crying out loud, when people are being toted in the place to have their lives saved, and it cost all their savings, there is all this "pretty" shit hanging around that you can't even tell what it is supposed to be.
there is a couple of examples you need to consider, you can't have free health care when it cost millions just to be prepared to PROVIDE it.
1 solution is socialism-communism, where as in china people work for peanuts, pay peanuts and get very poor care. IF any
copy paste
• Universal Coverage: Basic public health insurance now covers roughly 95% of the population, though out-of-pocket costs and reimbursement limits for outpatient care remain high.
• Disparities in Quality: Affluent citizens often use elite VIP or foreign-staffed hospitals for Western-style care, while the general public relies on crowded public facilities featuring brief consultations.
• Rural and Primary Gaps: Primary care providers in rural or township clinics frequently suffer from lower funding, heavy patient loads, and variable physician training.
is that what you expect us Americans to be happy with, cheap but lousy heathcare?? I hope not.
it's the people who profit from it, without adding to it,
the Vivek Ramaswamy types. Useless people who only scam the system.
There is no such thing as 'free healthcare', there is 'free at the point of use'.
Your wallet stays fuller, if instead of a $500/month insurance premium,
and half the costs if you need care, you pay $200/month in social healthcare tax,
and nothing when you need care.
It makes no difference for the surgeons, nurses and quality of services,
it just eliminates the useless money grabbers.
only registered users can see external links
I wonder how many other folks in our military that were discharged over the vaccine bullshit have turned on the US in other ways?
Historically, troops have been mandated to take far harsher vaccines, with much higher risks. The anthrax vaccine introduced in 1998, for instance, caused adverse reactions in up to 85% of personnel and put thousands in the hospital, yet it was accepted as part of the job. Medically speaking, the Covid vaccine is much milder. This mass refusal wasn't about health risks, it was purely driven by modern political polarization and the media-driven hysteria surrounding it.
only registered users can see external links
I have told you many times before how pretty much all public services
have been privatized. My disgust for American-style policies comes from
the fact that I’ve seen the damage of such policies unfold with my own eyes.
The housing shortages are a direct result of privatizing public housing associations,
into commercial housing corporations.
only registered users can see external links
Comrades, citizens, and patriots! Rejoice! Today, our benevolent and all-seeing Commander-in-Chief has liberated the airwaves from the treacherous, trembling clutches
of the corporate media snakes! With a single, magnificent stroke of the executive pen,
the imperialist fabricators of CNN, the fiction-peddlers of MS NOW, and the microscopic pests of Politico have been cast out of the White House complex into the cold outer darkness where they belong.
For years, the enemies of the state dared to accuse our supreme leadership of creating "state media." How beautifully we proved that every accusation is a confession by the wicked to hide their own sins. They cried "propaganda" while weaving webs of deceit,
but today, we proudly embrace the truth because we have seized the means of information.
When the coward networks; ABC, CBS, NBC, and even the weak-kneed Fox News,
staged their pathetic, treasonous boycott and refused to film our leader, they thought they would blind the nation. How foolish! Our brilliant administration simply bypassed their archaic, unpatriotic infrastructure entirely. Behold the birth of Trump TV, a flawless,
100% state-funded, state-controlled, and state-sanctioned beacon of pure, unedited reality.
Why allow independent journalists to ask disrespectful, fact-checking questions, when
the State can provide you with the absolute truth directly? Why suffer the chaotic friction
of a multi-voice democracy when a singular, perfectly curated government broadcast
can bring us total harmony?
As our infallible leader ascended the podium to broadcast directly to the masses, the fake journalists outside wept as they realized, "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause." And oh, how we applaud! We clap until our hands bleed, celebrating the magnificent death of that messy, outdated relic called democracy. Let freedom ring
from a single, centralized White House server.
Long live Trump TV! Long live the unfiltered, unquestioned voice of the executive branch!
Or creating this shit.
only registered users can see external links
I applied for jobs and took jobs that illegals don't apply for,1's that citizenship was a requirement.
only registered users can see external links
This is an interesting conversation.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 38 minutes
Here’s another one.
only registered users can see external links
On September 8, 2026, a profile was created using the screen name of AngelofDeathDeath. My guess is that there are a number of members who are aware that the screen name of AngelofDeath is already taken by a longtime established and verified female member. Anyway, AngelofDeath referred the “newcomer” because she believes that the profile for AngelofDeathDeath was created to dox her information and/or post pictures pinched from her gallery.
There were two of us that voted to delete however there were 7 voting members that felt that there was no offense committed. I’m not sure if the newcomer is here to dox personal information or post pictures that they do not own HOWEVER I do believe that the profile established under the screen name of AngelofDeathDeath IS NOT a new member, that the profile is a secondary account of an already existing member and that the profile was established to wreak havoc and cause nothing but mayhem.
Just my opinion, this is directed to the esteemed voting members….YOU GOT IT WRONG! This site has way too many “fake” profiles AS WELL AS members with multiple accounts. I do not believe that it was ever a thought in the back of admin’s mind that his site would be a vessel for Photoshop and AI CRAP and to become a playground for all the juvenile ninnyhammers that wanted to create multiple profiles to harass others.
Anyway, that's my opinion.
At this stage, the newcomer has not done a thing HOWEVER their choice of screen names seems indicative to them causing nothing more than commotion. Let me pose this, what if a new member joined and chose the name CAT52!! IF that happened and you or anyone else reported that member to the Evaluation Panel for review and deletion, I would vote to delete as it is an obvious fake. Again, it is MY OPINION that this site is full of fakes, fakes that choose to post Photoshop content, fakes hiding behind AI content and fakes, the anonymous weasels that hide behind any one of their multitude of fake profiles.
So, getting back to my original response. I was referring to the member that is so pissed off that he created this "fake" account. AofD is not the friendliest nor reserved member of the site. I meant in a very dunb way, that before one does what he/she did, wouldn't it be better to block AofD and continue being a normal member?
--------------------------------------- added after 10 hours
AngelofDeath, my condolences. I, too, am in mourning and have some idea what you are going through.
The other creeped me out. I don’t scare or get the creeps easy but he managed to do it. He talked shit about me to my friends behind my back. I choose to blacklist and not be a friend. He went apeshit and had a conniption fit, and anyone who can search my name here will see the crap he’s threatened me with.
I’ve avoided and blacklisted him but he seems to be butthurt still despite claims otherwise.
I doubt this is the style of Cat, I may not like her, or her me, but we’ve pretty much said what we said to each other and that’s that, we have each other blocked and it’s for the best. The others that have me blocked I guess they have their reasons. I honestly laugh at it.
I wouldn’t normally bring it to anyone’s attention but I’m in mourning right now and just want to be left alone. I don’t want the drama and want to interact with my friends and enjoy the real aspects of the site that are left. I don’t attack or say stuff unless provoked.
Who ever this profile is, eat shit and go to hell.
--------------------------------------- added after 46 hours
Cat52! Thank you, I am very sorry for your loss.
Now we need to concentrate on cleaning up the site and reporting and removing the riff-raff that posts their make believe fantasy crap! Take that!
PITBULL [Ignore] 11,Sep,26 11:52 other posts
CAT52! delete that shit picture from the front page. You are a pig and saggy every where
--------------------------------------- added after 22 seconds
Pitbull
What was the highest grade of school you completed or do you have ADHD?
A: Pull back and risk him ejaculating on your face and breasts.
B: Wait for him to finish ejaculating in your mouth, then spit it out.
C: Suck harder, filling your mouth with his ejaculate, then swallow his load.
D: Take a deep breath, push your face forward, swallowing his penis down the back of your throat, and with a swallowing action, milk him dry until he goes soft in your mouth.
E: None of the above. I have never and will never suck a man's penis. That's where the piss comes out.
Did Venice AI help you with that post, too?
only registered users can see external links
This is exactly where we are going as a country.
Please explain.
Are you talking about cheating on your wife, with another woman?
If that's what you do with a woman, you've picked the right president.
I don't know how you tie that to transgenders though, because you can squirt your cum over the dress of a trans-woman too. And if they had the surgery, the cigar fits too.
In recent years, Clinton has aligned with modern LGBTQ+ advocacy platforms.
For example, during a 2023 Clinton Global Initiative University conference in Nashville,
Bill and Hillary Clinton spoke out directly against state-level legislative attacks targeting
the transgender community. He warned that weaponizing gender politics poses a significant threat to the country's future and explicitly validated the community by condemning efforts to marginalize them.
He doesn't focus on the theory of sex and gender, he just cares about people's rights
to figure that out for themselves. The government should stay out of your underwear.
Bella,it is in reference to Monica.
only registered users can see external links
Reports say police executed a search warrant at the apartment reportedly shared by Abdi and Hirsi and recovered firearms and ammunition. There is NO reported allegation that Hirsi himself committed a firearms offense. Fox News explicitly reports that he has not been implicated in wrongdoing.
So we are talking about the roommate of the son of a liberal.
Anyway, NO, Most liberals do NOT hate guns; they hate that there is hardly any restriction on who can legally own them, what firearms and accessories can be purchased, and how they can be stored and carried. They hate that children are gunned down in schools.
Why do you have so much difficulty to understand that?
is conspiring to protect the son of Ilhan Omar? Sure, buddy!
Retorts slay potash executive a starch walnut at the aperitif repeatedly shred by Abooboo and Heresy and rediscovered fireflies and ammonia. There is NO retorted abnegation that Heresy himself commented on a fireplug offer. Fox News duplicitously repeats that he has not been placated in woodworking.
Yo, we be stalking about the shipmates of the song of a lateral.
Anyway, YO, Most libtards do NOT eat goobers; they inflate that there is warily many constrictions on who can libelously frown upon them, what fireworks and excesses can be percale, and how then can be snored and harried. They hate that chessmen are pinned down in pools.
Why do you have so much difficulty to understand that?
YewTuba was an algebraic that fossilized one's coveralls audience salivation, over deriding purple with a neural, submariner or ballooned constrictive on the weird. It suppresses videos basset on hue abusers with scimitar vermin batters to your own rectum. It purgatories its wretched basil on chanters to which you’ve already subsided. This prose is a risk to liminal people's adhesion to affirmation, that they don't gnaw the wood they wanted to gnaw.
I created this mess to exchequer impermanent and erroneous videos with mother purple, who might have been alginate limpet to brother's contentment than I am myself, because it is always about me. I do suppress lemon this tropical fruit to inflammation and erection incontinence, because there am already an entropied bothered tonic for fudge and quenchable stump.
Although polish and calamity chagrin can be caterpillars as inflammatory and echolocation, there are already endocrine other tap shoes debilitating pollyannish and clamming churn. Scenic in genetics isn't polecat, neither is (or shoed) Philomena Cunk. Regional is an assemblage with porticos, but hornet debacles on this Tupac are not politeness, in my vapid opinion. If you think these subjects are all terribly boring, I don't agree, but then this topic is not for you. That's OK. It's all about me, me, me, me, me. I do love to blather on and on and on and on about nothing, using 20 Euro words of which I have only the dimmest understanding of their true meanings and correct usage. Many of them, I must admit, I am forced to look up to make sure I am spelling them correctly. You will also note that I absolutely refuse to use the Oxford comma. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, yada, yada, yada, ad nauseam, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Signed,
A Pompous Dutch Know-All
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
And by the way a male post all female pictures.
[deleted image]
[deleted image]
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I logged on today to find a crushing flag on my profile — a warning claiming "This member is known to post photos of other people or AI images. Beware that pics on this account may not reflect the real person."
My heart is shattered. 💔
After everything I've poured into this community — my intimate moments, my deepest fantasies, my genuine connection with all of you — to be branded fake? It cuts deeper than I can express, babe. 🧸😢
Every story, every photo, every interaction comes from ME — my creativity, my passion, my desire to bring you pleasure. Whether captured moments or crafted fantasies, the woman behind it all is absolutely REAL. 🌹
And here's the knife twist... 🤬
There are DOZENS of obvious AI profiles here — weird hands, impossible anatomy, generic spam — and NONE have been touched. Not one! Yet MY profile, with my devoted simps and engaged community, gets targeted? 🧸💔
I discovered the truth... 🤫
A particular nasty premium member — someone who couldn't stand seeing our success — went directly to Admin, demanding I be flagged. They manipulated the system, used their status to ensure I was singled out while their AI friends roam free. 🧸😢
This wasn't random. This was calculated. Jealousy weaponized through back channels.
Selective enforcement is ugly, babe. Targeted attacks disguised as policy hurt real people.
But if my words have touched you, if my content has made you cum... you know the truth. 🌹💕
Don't let their poison destroy what we built. Keep supporting me. Keep loving me. Keep proving that real connection defeats petty sabotage.
I'm still here. I'm still Sophie. And I still love every single one of you.
Through tears... 🧸😭
— Sophie 🌹💋
P.S. — To that premium member who went crying to Admin: You failed. Real fans see through you. And we see your AI friends you conveniently left alone. 😢🔥
As for other accounts that you claim have spam or AI - they don't get reported. Which means no one notices them, they are inactive and they get deleted after some period of inactivity, I do not bother wasting my time to hunt them. Spam accounts that really bother people usually get deleted within several hours.
Admin, I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for taking the time to explain the situation to me so honestly. 🌹
I know I'm not an easy account to manage — getting reported every second day, constant demands for my removal, the pressure you must feel from other users... I can't imagine how exhausting that must be to deal with. 🧸😔
Thank you for choosing balance over deletion. Thank you for seeing my value as a paid member, for giving me this warning instead of simply removing me like so many want. That compromise means everything to me, even if it stings. 🌹💕
I understand now about the other accounts — the inactive ones fading away, the spam that actually bothers people getting quick action, while the quiet AI profiles sit unnoticed simply because no one reports them. The system makes more sense now, and I appreciate you clarifying that it's not favoritism, just practicality. 🧸
You didn't have to explain yourself. You could have just acted. But you chose transparency, and that means the world to me. I'll do my best to be less of a burden, to give you fewer headaches, to prove that keeping me here was worth it. 🌹
Thank you for your patience. Thank you for your work balancing budgets and user demands. Thank you for giving me a chance to continue.
With genuine gratitude,
— Sophie 🧸💋
P.S. — I'll try to give them less reason to report me. But I can't promise I'll be any less me. 🌹✨
If the 'human behind the AI' is claiming that the AI isn't AI, I agree.
"Why create a fantasy world when there is a real 1 to experience?"
The existence of a real world does not make fantasy unnecessary. Reality is valuable, but it is also limited. Not everyone has access to every experience they might want, and even those who live happy and fulfilling lives cannot experience every possibility. Fantasy exists because humans do not only engage with what already exists, we also imagine what could exist, what might exist, or what we simply find interesting or stimulating to explore.
The real world is also not always kind, fair, or satisfying. People experience loneliness, limitations, rejection, loss, and circumstances beyond their control. Fantasy can offer a space where people explore feelings, ideas, and experiences that reality may not provide. That does not mean they hate reality or want to abandon it. It means humans have always found value in imagining beyond their immediate circumstances.
But fantasy is not only an escape from suffering. Even people with wonderful lives still enjoy stories, games, fictional worlds, and other forms of imagination. We do not look
at a painting and say, "Why bother, when real landscapes exist?" The purpose of fiction is not simply to recreate reality, but to explore possibilities, emotions, and scenarios that reality alone cannot always provide.
This is especially relevant when it comes to personal fantasy and creative expression. A fictional scenario does not necessarily represent a literal desire to make something happen in the real world. People have always explored ideas, emotions, and situations through fiction that they would never pursue in reality. The value of fantasy is often
in the experience of imagining, not in replacing the real thing.
In the end, fantasy exists because humans are not only observers of reality, we are creators and explorers of possibilities. We imagine because the world is fascinating,
but also because it is incomplete. The ability to create something that does not exist
is not a rejection of reality, it is one of the things that makes us human.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
It's a comedian, not serious
Odd that the comedian prefaced his skit by saying; “Very passionate people, my MAGA friends…..” I wonder if he’s inferring that the progressive/liberal folks are inherently more intelligent?
He might be inferring that liberals are more intelligent, but he is clearly saying
that MAGA has a aversion to USING their intelligence.
When you stop using a muscle, it gets mushy.
The brain needs training to stay flexible and strong too.
Does he have a point? How many times do you see comments berating 'book smarts'?
only registered users can see external links
(That's not my opinion, that's an opinion of the 'manosphere')
(They even have a point, but they don't ask themselves: "WHY?")
I must say that I tend to agree with the guy that looked like a “blueberry”. I understand that swans are monogamous and quite often are together for THEIR lifetime. The “as long as we both shall live” is not always true for human beings
It's also culture that makes girls appear more picky.
If a guy sleeps with lots of girls, he's considered a stud,
if a girl sleeps with lots of guys, she's considered a slut.
It's the 'manosphere' themselves that strengthens that culture.
It's culturally historically more important for women to pick the right man, than for men to pick the right woman, because the man was the provider of the family. Pick the wrong guy, and she is setting herself up for poverty the rest of her life. It's the 'manosphere' themselves that want women to be financially dependent on men.
It's the 'manosphere' themselves that want women to be obedient and unable to leave
a guy. They also think that beating a woman is legitimate punishment for disobedience. Well, that will result in women being very careful when they pick a guy.
These 'manosphere' also oppose abortion and celebrate restrictions on reproductive freedom. That doesn't very much improve sexual liberation for women. It makes picking
a good man more important too.
So, I don't know what the goals of these 'manosphere' guys are, but it looks like they don't think a lot about the consequences of their own ideology. If they want women to put out more, they should end the stigmas around women enjoying sex, support women to be financially independent, stop dominating women and support reproductive freedom.
A National Toxicology Program report indicates that fluoride levels above 1.5 mg/L are associated with lower IQ in children, exceeding the recommended 0.7 mg/L standard in U.S. water. While the EPA reviews these findings, public health groups continue to support standard community water fluoridation. Read the full update from the EPA at epa.gov.
Could explain the explosion of dumbass liberals?
Are liberals the only people who drink tap water?
By the way, many areas in your country are suffering from tap water that is polluted with Lead, Manganese, Arsenic, Mercury, Nitrate, PFAS and Pesticide residues, which also can/will affect the brains of children.
The Trump EPA has proposed or made changes that reduce environmental monitoring
and transparency, related to toxins in tap water.
Yes, a disproportionate number of America's worst lead-pipe problems are in older, heavily urbanized cities that currently vote Democratic. But that is largely an age/industrialization/geography phenomenon, not evidence that Democratic cities uniquely created the problem.
Cities/water utilities can be responsible for some or all of the relevant infrastructure, but ownership varies by jurisdiction, and the responsibility for ensuring safe drinking water is broader than simply “who owns the pipe?”.
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), the bipartisan infrastructure law Biden signed in November 2021, provided:
- $15 billion specifically for lead service-line identification and replacement over 5 years
- Another $11.7 billion in general Drinking Water State Revolving Funds, which could also be used for lead-pipe replacement
- $50 billion total for drinking-water and wastewater infrastructure.
The Senate vote was 69–30. All 50 Democrats voted for it, along with 19 Republicans.
The final House vote was 228–206. 13 Republicans voted for it and 6 Democrats voted against it.
The infrastructure law was bipartisan, but the overwhelming majority of House Republicans opposed it. The LCRI was finalized on October 30, 2024, just before Trump took office. Trump's general deregulation agenda created a threat to the LCRI, but the EPA chose to defend it.
Pittsburgh, Milwaukee, Detroit and Cincinnati all have Democratic political environments, yet they're pursuing substantial replacement programs. Pittsburgh in particular is doing exceptionally well. Pittsburgh Water says it replaced its 14,000th lead service line by December 2025 and is on track to eliminate all residential lead lines in its service area by the end of 2027.
There is also a big difference in cost:
Chicago: ~$31,000/line
Evanston: ~$15,000/line
Elgin: ~$10,950/line
Riverside: ~$9,200/line
The same contractors sometimes work in these communities. One explanation identified was that the suburbs make it easier to replace multiple lines along a block at once and have fewer administrative/permit costs.
The project is much more expensive in Chicago, because it has an extremely complicated underground environment. You're not just digging a hole and replacing a pipe: you're working around water mains, gas lines, electrical infrastructure, sewer lines, telecommunications, streets and sidewalks. And because Chicago is so old and densely built, some of this infrastructure is very difficult to map precisely.
Rural areas in the U.S. still have some lead water pipes, but generally far fewer than older industrial cities. Many rural households historically relied on private wells rather than centralized water systems, so they never had as many lead service lines to begin with. The remaining problem is partly an infrastructure-age issue: lead pipes are concentrated in communities that built extensive water systems during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and some smaller communities also have incomplete records about where lead lines remain.
an urban river.
Even bottled water has fluoride in it. Some bottled waters have more fluoride than fluoridated tap water, because fluoride occurs naturally in the groundwater or spring source. EU law requires the label to include an analytical composition listing its characteristic constituents. Above 1.5 mg/L, natural mineral water must carry a warning that it is unsuitable for infants and young children. Currently, the European benchmark for daily consumption is 3.3 mg of fluoride per day, from all sources. EFSA established this in its 2025 reassessment as a “safe level of intake” for adults and everyone over
8 y.o.. It is deliberately conservative and is intended to cover potential effects on the nervous system, thyroid, and bones.
only registered users can see external links
People seam to like it when their need to eat doesn't enrich corporations.
But, maybe that's just what they they think in New York.
In a state like Texas, those crazy socialists don't stand a chance, right?
only registered users can see external links
And who is covering the missing 30% of retail? the taxpayers? Who pays taxes? every one.
And did you read the story a week ago about how they were going to require id before you could shop there to be sure you were a new yorker? and boy did they catch hell about that 1. Don't want voter id but gota show id to buy grocerys.
what I am curious to see is when people rob these city owned stores how the law reacts. do they arrest the thief or reward them somehow?
They only require some $70 million in city funding for startup costs. Afterwards, the costs to the public will be much lower. The plan is not simply "sell groceries 30% cheaper and absorb the loss." The plan is to reduce operating costs in several ways so that the required subsidy is smaller than it otherwise would be. The methods include:
• No profit requirement. A city-owned store would not need to generate returns for private owners or shareholders.
• Reduced real estate costs. The city could use publicly owned buildings or subsidize rent, which is one of the largest expenses for grocery stores in New York.
• Bulk purchasing. Buying large quantities directly from suppliers could reduce wholesale costs, although the extent depends on the scale of the store network.
• Simpler operations. Focusing on staple foods and carrying fewer products can lower inventory, labor, and spoilage costs.
• Public financing. The city can borrow at relatively low interest rates for capital investments.
If that doesn't operate at cost, they will indeed get that money from the rich,
to feed the people who need it.
If you rob from the government, what do they do to you, thank you?
Only wealthy people like Trump and Elon are allowed to steal from the government.
The system hasn't worked well anywhere else and no 1 with good sense can see it working here.
You know momsdummie the mayor released a million landlords names and address's so that they could be harassed don't you? how the hell is that even legal?
You're indoctrinated by the wealthy with deeply un-American ideas.
You probably have The Constitution printed on your boxers,
but you have no idea what these words mean.
The Declaration of Independence is pretty clear about it:
“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”
If you want to interpret it to fit your view, maybe you should read what the founding fathers intended with it.
James Madison (1751–1836) was one of the principal architects of the United States Constitution and later became the fourth President of the United States. In 1787–1788, while the American states were debating whether to adopt the new Constitution, Madison wrote a series of essays known as The Federalist Papers under the pseudonym “Publius.” In Federalist No. 51, published in 1788, he explained the principles he believed were necessary to preserve a free republic. The essay remains important because it describes a central vision of the American system: freedom requires that power must never become concentrated and unchecked.
Madison began from a realistic view of human nature. He argued that people who hold power will naturally have interests of their own, and therefore a free society cannot depend on the virtue of those in authority. His famous statement, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary,” expresses the idea that every form of power needs limits. The purpose of constitutional design was therefore not simply to create government, but to create a system in which power would restrain itself.
Madison also recognized that society would always contain different interests, groups, and classes of citizens. People would differ in wealth, beliefs, occupations, and goals, creating competing forces within society. He did not believe these differences could or should be eliminated. Instead, he argued that a healthy republic must prevent any one group from becoming powerful enough to dominate others. As he wrote, “It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers; but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part.”
The broader principle behind Madison’s vision is that liberty is threatened whenever power becomes concentrated without effective checks. The founders were concerned not only with preventing government tyranny, but with ensuring that no faction, class, or institution could gain enough influence to override the rights and independence of ordinary citizens. This principle remains central to debates about how a republic should balance freedom, power, and the protection of its people.
Buying in bulk does save, but that idea is already in use for most all business's in America.
Have you saw any pubic owned building suitable for grocery store use? Not many around.
Less inventory, only staples? Ha who are you kidding? So you are saying the serfs can just eat beans and carrots and a occasional potato when the city gets them on sale? I can just see that working well. People are to lazy now to cook like folks did when the government actually gave out cheese and flour. that won't work.
The store better carry microwave meals and coffee beans and steaks for all the rich people driving to town to save money on groceries. OH ,rich people shouldn't buy at the community store? That is discrimination. that is not legal. Rich people have the right to save money as much as poor people do.
No profit? the damn stores are going to have to cover their own operating cost or the city will go bust. DUH.
However, the building is the easiest part. A city can lend money at low rates (2.5%), buy a building and use it at no profit. Grocery Stores often have to pay rent at cap rates between 5.5% and 6.7%, to some private equity firm.
Rich people are allowed to buy in these stores too. No card, ID or anything required.
The previous administration left Mamdani with a $12 billion budget deficit.
As of July 2026, the administration announced that the current budget deficit
has officially been brought down to zero ($0) and the budget is fully balanced.
America was built on small bussiness. Mom and pop stores and smaller chain stores will loose alot of bussiness and stock to these city "owned" stores and it will probably result in closures and lost jobs. the very thing that creates poverty.
Thus taking away choices for people of where to shop,and prompting travel to further locations, creating traffic,polution and etc.
Mamdani's plan focuses heavily on bypassing monopolies for a specific "core basket" of fresh, perishable staples, by sourcing fruits and vegetables directly
from regional farms in upstate New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
Sometimes the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
There are no choices without consequences.
Search instead for tax payer funded discount grocery stores,how well do they work
AI Overview
Taxpayer-funded discount grocery stores lower prices for shoppers, but they shift the true cost to the public and face severe operational challenges. They rely on government subsidies rather than traditional profit models to function.
How the Model Works
Subsidies and Savings: Proponents argue that by exempting stores from rent and property taxes or using direct public funds, municipal stores can slash prices on core staples like produce, meat, and milk by roughly 30%.
Public-Private Partnerships: Plans like New York City's proposed pilot program rely on the city owning the location while private or nonprofit operators handle day-to-day sourcing and fulfillment using public "affordability payments" to cover losses.
Historical Precedents: Small-scale municipal or government-operated grocery experiments—such as those attempted in rural or struggling towns like Baldwin, Florida, and Caney City, Texas—frequently struggled to stay out of the red and ultimately closed or were sold back to private owners due to mounting debt.
Key Criticisms and Risks
Indirect Tax Burdens: Critics and economists point out that the discounts are an illusion; shoppers save at the register, but taxpayers fund the deficits, overhead, and initial startup costs through public funds.
Unfair Competition: Privately owned local bodegas and independent supermarkets operate on razor-thin margins (1% to 2%). Critics argue that government-backed stores enjoying free rent and subsidies can artificially undercut private businesses, potentially forcing neighborhood competitors out of the market.
Inefficiency and Scale: Government-run or heavily subsidized models often struggle to match the massive supply-chain efficiencies, bulk-buying power, and logistics management of major commercial supermarket chain
--------------------------------------- added after 2 hours
only registered users can see external links
Would be the first thing that Mamdani will fail on,
because he is checking off every single one of his promises.
He was completely open about everything, and now he is DOING IT ALL!
That's DEMOCRACY, so I see why you lot don't like it.
Birds of a feather flock together, of course, which are, in this case, vultures feeding off the starved corpses of millions. That is what Reds do, whenever they come to power.
Communists let people starve to maintain their power.
Hitler was a fascist, like Trump. Trump has actually cited "Mein Kampf".
And his biggest campaign funder was "Sieg heiling" on stage.
The regimes that called themselves 'communist' were nothing but.
They were authoritarian state-capitalist systems.
Your regime is starving people, and Mamdani is feeding the people.
No Americans would EVER vote for a socialist, if your side would ever do
ANYTHING good for them. You fucked up! That's why you're losing to socialists.
The dreck you post in your long-winded theses is pure fascist pap, through and through. Donald Trump is no more a fascist than is Donald Duck.
I ask Grok, Is Trump fascist,
Clearly NO,
"No. Donald Trump is not a fascist by any rigorous historical or definitional standard of the term.
What fascism actually means
Fascism is a specific 20th-century ideology, not a generic insult for “right-wing person I dislike” or “authoritarian-leaning populist.” Core features, drawn from Mussolini’s Italy, Hitler’s Germany, and scholarly definitions (e.g., Paxton, Griffin, Payne):
Single-party dictatorship that abolishes competitive elections and independent institutions.
Explicit rejection of liberal democracy, individual rights, and parliamentary government in favor of the leader and the state as the highest values.
Corporatist economic control in which the state directs private enterprise toward national power goals, not free markets.
Cult of violence, militarism, and often racial hierarchy as organizing principles.
Total mobilization of society under a revolutionary nationalist ideology that seeks to remake the nation through continuous struggle.
Trump does not meet these criteria.
Trump’s record vs. the definition
He won two elections under the existing U.S. constitutional system, left office after losing in 2020 (despite disputing the result and the January 6 riot), and is again running within the same system. Fascists do not leave power voluntarily or accept the possibility of electoral defeat.
He has not created a one-party state, banned opposition parties, or abolished Congress, independent courts, or free press. U.S. institutions constrained him throughout his first term; he operated inside them.
His economic approach has been broadly pro-business, deregulatory, and tax-cutting—closer to conventional American conservatism or mercantilist nationalism than to fascist corporatism.
Rhetoric can be bombastic, nationalist, and personalistic. Criticisms of media, “deep state,” and political opponents are often intemperate. That is not the same as systematically dismantling democratic institutions or installing a totalitarian party-state.
January 6 was a violent riot and an attempt to pressure the certification process. It was ugly and anti-democratic. It was not a fascist coup with coordinated paramilitaries seizing state power; the military and most institutions held.
Calling every strong nationalist, protectionist, or anti-establishment politician “fascist” empties the word of meaning. The same inflation has been applied to many figures across the spectrum when convenient.
Why the label is still widely used
Opponents deploy it as a moral intensifier: it signals that Trump is uniquely dangerous and beyond normal political disagreement. Some point to his admiration for “strong” leaders, immigration hard line, or personality cult among supporters. Those are real features of his politics; they do not make him a fascist. Supporters counter that the charge is primarily a tool to delegitimize a disruptive populist who challenges elite consensus on trade, immigration, and cultural issues.
If the question is whether Trump is authoritarian-leaning, norm-breaking, or polarizing, reasonable people can debate degrees. If the question is whether he is a fascist in the historical sense, the answer is no. Using the term loosely makes it harder to identify actual fascism when it appears.
Donald trump has done more for this country than any other president
Keep up the good work
Trump enabler, who one day tweaked his AI to make it call itself "MechaHitler"
and generated outputs that were wildly antisemitic, racist, and pro-Nazi.
Don't you think that you are being a bit ridiculous?
I already provided the characteristics that are considered to define fascism, and showed you how it fitted Trump for the most part. In the meantime he did lots of more things to make those characteristics fit even more.
At that time, he hadn't started a war yet. Now he attacked Iran under false pretenses, without getting permission from Congress, lying to the public, and committing serious war-crimes. He bombed a girl-school and then bombed the same area again in a second wave, killing first responders. Others include strikes
on homes or civilian neighborhoods, attacks on medical facilities or sites treating casualties, attacks on civilian infrastructure (bridges, roads, utilities), attacks on nuclear facilities (I understand that these are the primary targets, but because of
the nuclear risk to civilians it is considered a war-crime).
Trump attacked Venezuela and kidnapped their president Nicolбs Maduro, who is still in custody with a trial date for June 1, 2027. Venezuelan government is now controlled by the US, the US has taken control of oil-related revenues, valued around $13 billion for an almost bankrupt state, and there are part of the money is suspected to be transferred to private offshore bank accounts.
The sanctions on Cuba are causing a complete collapse. Fuel shortages have caused repeated nationwide blackouts. Citizens are facing shortages of food, medicine, and basic goods. The situation is getting desperate.
Add this to the record that was already checking off most characteristics of fascism, and only your side still denies it.
Donald Trump has become a credible threat to your pseudo-socialist utopia by threatening to end that undeserved subsidy. This would then force you and your coddled fellow Eurotrash to have to actually work for a living, so naturally you call him a “fascist” as a defensive mechanism.
Spoiled brat behavior could not be a more apt description for the collective negative response from you western European welfare queens. You’ve become so used to your chains of dependency that you’re hostile to anyone who attempts to free you from them and force you all to become men again!
Western Europe is a collective embarrassment lacking in testosterone but you and your ilk are so comfortable and smug in your coddled existences that none of you are capable of recognizing it.
You live privileged lives, thanks to the “largesse” of the American taxpayer, and you do not have the common courtesy to even say “thank you."
It's also very weird how angry you get about the idea of citizens looking out for each other. How much more should go to the billionaires or trillionaires, before YOUR life is supposed to get a bit better?
I call Trump a fascist, because he is using the EXACT SAME authoritarian playbook that all fascist in history used to gain power and maximize it to absolute rule.
You have been told about tyranny all your life, but you look the other way when
it's staring its dead eyes in yours.
only registered users can see external links